MAOZCORPORATE INVESTIGATIONS

Case files

Selected engagements

A selection of files, without identifying details. Every file turns on what was found in it, and nothing here promises or forecasts a comparable outcome elsewhere.

  1. EX/1

    $1.8M

    2025
    Internal investigation · New York

    Vendor fraud inside a mid-market distributor

    → $1.8M traced; matter settled before filing

    Client: not disclosed

    A duplicate-payment pattern led to a vendor incorporated three weeks before its first invoice. Devices were imaged before any interview, and the money trail was mapped across four entities in two states.

  2. EX/2

    $6.4M

    2025
    Post-judgment enforcement · SDNY

    Asset tracing against a judgment debtor pleading insolvency

    → Three properties worth $6.4M identified and restrained

    Client: not disclosed

    Holdings sat behind nominee entities in Delaware and Cyprus. The work combined corporate filings, land records and field verification, and was delivered as the evidentiary basis for a restraining notice.

  3. EX/3

    2024
    Due diligence · Los Angeles

    Pre-investment diligence on a Series B target

    → The round was halted two days before signing

    Client: not disclosed

    Two proceedings settled under seal involving the same officer did not appear in the data room. The finding came from court registries in two states and was corroborated against local-language press.

  4. EX/4

    812 files

    2024
    Digital forensics · Los Angeles

    Departing engineer returned a wiped device

    → The deletion itself became the central evidence

    Client: not disclosed

    Imaging showed 812 files removed inside a forty-minute window the day before resignation. Sync logs established where they went, and the file was handed to counsel for injunctive relief.

Files are shown with client consent and without identifying details. Nothing here is legal advice, and none of it should be relied on without specific assessment.

In clients' own words

An 1888 architectural elevation of a courthouse facade, in ink on aged paper
  • “They told us in the first call what not to do. That is what saved the evidence.”

    J. L. · CFO, embezzlement investigation, 2025

  • “The report was the only thing in the file we could put in front of a judge unedited.”

    M. B. · Partner, commercial litigation firm, 2025

A question about your own matter? Open a file →