Surveillance
What is actually happening, filmed and logged — within the law of the jurisdiction where it is done.
Surveillance is the most misunderstood tool in the field. It does not solve a case on its own; it corroborates or refutes one specific contested claim — capacity to work, place of residence, a business relationship, a breach of non-compete.
So it begins with a written question. "Follow him" is not an assignment; "is he operating the competing business during working hours" is. Without the question there is nothing to document, and nothing to measure the result against.
What is permitted varies between countries, and sometimes between states within the US. Each office works to the rules of its own jurisdiction, including local licensing. Documentation obtained unlawfully is not merely inadmissible — it exposes the client.
What you get
Observation log with time and location stamps
Stills and video with a documented chain of custody
Verification of residence, occupation and vehicles
Documentation for insurance and employment claims
Locally licensed teams in every jurisdiction
Investigator testimony on collection methodology
How it runs
Question
Exactly what is to be corroborated or refuted. Without it there is no test for success.
Feasibility
What is lawful there, what licensing is required, and what can be documented from public space at all.
Field
Local team, continuous log, timestamps. Gaps in the log are what cross-examination looks for.
Delivery
Raw material retained alongside the report. An edit without the original is evidence that is easy to attack.
Start with a conversation
Half an hour, free, confidential. If we decide we have nothing to add, we will say so.
Arrange a call